Shenzhen realty 深圳房产

Developers submitted to the details of consumers as a result of disputes through conciliation back 620,000 consumers paying back the principal

recording of evidence or infuriating developers, Lo as a basis for a developer to to recover the property sold. Recently, Mr. He in Luohu District, the Consumer Council’s help, from a real estate developer in return for 62.9 million to buy a house section and at the same time with each other lifting the subscription contract.

not get room to negotiate 15 times

2002年11月底, Liantang Ho to our city in a garden with the real estate development company to a one-time payment to purchase a set of for a total amount of 629,856 yuan residential and signed a “offers.” But since then, the two sides have been submitted to the details of disputes, contradictions and deeper, eventually leading to a formal contract had not even signed. Over the past year, Mr. He and his son have to negotiate with each other 15 times, but under, he came to Luohu District Council complaints.

purchase Mr. Fang He believes that real estate development companies as a result of unilateral actions to alter the contract, the room into the water is not clear that there is no occupation formalities in time, “real estate contract for the sale of” undue loss, has been asked for repossession refuse and other reasons, he was unable to lead normal procedures. He requested the assistance of the development of the company as soon as possible after completing the relevant procedures in order to move his family.

developers no buyers in good faith that the buyer

the real estate development company that has property rights in accordance with the Government to prove that the relevant regulations, published in the newspaper notice there is no time to handle each other. With regard to water issues into the room, a management office also issued to Mr. He proved, but he did not sign. For the house facades, to safeguard the image of the whole building, the company should enjoy the right to the use of unified management, which is the industry’s widespread practice, is not deliberately making things difficult for Mr. He, not unilaterally amend the contract. In addition, Mr. He with the company to negotiate a dispute arises, the unauthorized recording a total of 15 times, is the lack of sincerity in practice. Therefore, the company that Mr. He violated the relevant provisions of the sale of real estate, decided to cancel the real estate transaction. The company and superior research unit in charge decided to resolve the dispute through legal channels.

through conciliation, consumers back to purchase paragraph

3 30, in Luohu District Council mediation room, consumers Ho and a real estate development company to accept mediation.

via Lo Wu District Council mediation, the real estate developer agreed to subscribe for books not in accordance with the agreement, Mr. He does not deduct 10 percent penalty, only to recover the invoices, notices, etc. occupation credentials, at the same time to lift real estate subscription contracts, paying back the principal of all 629,856 yuan will be returned to Mr. He. The development agreement with Mr. He, the two sides agreed to terminate the contract. April 12, he has been in accordance with the conciliation agreement, 629,856 yuan to get the full purchase paragraph.

Chinese version:大曝光：录音取证惹怒开发商 购房一年竟无法入住

开发商消费者因交房细节发生纠纷，经调解消费者拿回62万房款

录音取证惹怒开发商，罗湖某开发商以此为由要收回售出的房产。近日，何先生在罗湖区消委会的帮助下，从某房地产开发商的手中取回了62.9万元的买房款，并同时与对方解除认购合同。

交涉15次拿不到房

2002年11月底，何先生到我市莲塘某花园与该房地产开发公司以一次性付款方式购买了一套总价为629856元的住宅，并签订了《认购书》。但此后，双方一直在交房细节上纠纷不断，矛盾越来越深，最终导致连正式合同都没有签订。一年多来，何先生及其儿子先后与对方交涉15次，无奈之下，他来到罗湖区消委会投诉。

购房方何先生认为，由于房地产开发公司单方面改动合同、房间入水却不说明、没有及时办理入伙手续、《房地产买卖合同》无故丢失、要求收楼却遭拒绝等原因，导致他无法正常办理手续入住。他要求开发公司应尽快协助办完相关手续，以便他全家入住。

开发商认为买方无购房诚意

该房地产开发公司负责人则认为，公司已经按照政府办理产权证明有关规定，在报纸上刊登了通知，而对方没有按时来办理。关于房间入水问题，管理处也给何先生出具了证明，但他没有签收。对于房子外墙，为维护整栋大楼的形象，公司应享有统一管理使用的权利，这是行业普遍的做法，并非故意刁难何先生，并不是单方面修改合同。另外，何先生与该公司发生纠纷交涉起，私自录音共达15次之多，是缺乏诚意的做法。所以，公司认为何先生违反了房地产买卖有关规定，决定取消房产交易。该公司和上级主管单位研究决定，通过司法途径解决纠纷。

经调解，消费者拿回购房款

3月30日，在罗湖区消委会调解室，消费者何先生和某房地产开发公司负责人接受调解。

经罗湖区消委会调解，该房地产开发商同意不依照认购书上约定，不扣除何先生10％违约金，只收回发票、入伙通知书等凭据，同时解除房产认购合同，将629856元房款全部退还给何先生。该开发公司与何先生达成一致，双方同意解除合同。4月12日，何先生已经按调解协议，全额取回了629856元购房款。