Shenzhen realty 深圳房产

intermediary posing as buyers to deceive the owner

Venue: Shenzhen

post Amount: 70,000 yuan

2007 years 7 early Mr. Yang will be located in the city, Futian District Court of a property at the same time a number of property entrusted to an intermediary company for sale, pre-sale price of 2.65 million yuan. July 8, Mr. Yang received a Real Estate Broker Co., Ltd. Branch home town Royale Miss Gu Wenzhang phone, Miss Zhang told Mr. Yang, customers韦某eyes on his house, ready to bid for the purchase of 2.6 million yuan house, and had to pay 5,000 yuan deposit.

7 on 10, Mr. Yang after consultation with the韦某to 2.63 million yuan turnover, and the signing of “real estate trading and intermediary service contract”, the first paragraph for 200,000 yuan. Signed contract,韦某said no the first paragraph temporarily, a few days in the payment, first delivery of intermediary companies 100,000 yuan deposit.

7 29, when Mr. Yang in the Internet has no intention to found their own house is just to sell online sales, selling those who buy their own house is韦某, but the price has become a 2.7 million yuan. Contact with each other, the other that he is the real estate company’s property consultant.

To this end, Mr. Yang repeated complaints to the company, the company, a person in charge said that Miss Wei is now on leave, if Mr. Yang of the transaction have any questions, you can through legal channels. And Miss Wei has said that the matter has nothing to do with her, please look for the company, Mr. Yang consultation.

“real estate SHOW” Comments: It is a very typical case of an intermediary to eat the difference. Intermediary companies posing as buyers, the use of information asymmetry, to conceal the true price, fraud improper interests.

greedy intermediary was sentenced to return to eat the difference

Location: Shanghai

post the amount of: 100,000 element

2005 in early, Miss Zhang, through an intermediary company to buy a certain number Jiangning Road property. Contract the same day, Miss Xiang Zhang intermediary companies to collect 100,000 yuan deposit and produce a housing price 207 million housing contract for the sale, and then come up with 6 contracts were called one by one Miss Zhang signature, but indicated that a buy by price The contract of 1.97 million yuan, will not do anything to explain. The real estate broker who also told the sale of Mr. Chen, Miss Zhang asked people to buy a house to raise prices to 207 million, for the purpose of obtaining high loans.

2005 years 3 months, Mr. Xiang Chen Miss Zhang request by the intermediary company collected 100,000 yuan receipt when paying back the principal, Mr. Chen said they had never received any sum of money. Miss Zhang has raised the alert for April 5 to an intermediary company sued the court. Miss Zhang said in the lawsuit that he never made loans to intermediary companies such request, the intermediary company is using unfair means to cheat in the post.

Jingan District Court found that the process of intermediary in the transaction not only positive for a different contract prices, but also to conceal the real Miss Zhang sale price, and usually does not match the rules of operation. Miss Zhang requested the return of 100,000 yuan price difference can be supported. In view of this, the court verdict was returned by the intermediary company overcharged prices Miss Zhang 100,000 yuan and 10,000 yuan intermediary service charges.

“real estate SHOW” Comments: to cope with the high loan for deception under the guise of the original owner, so that buyers and sellers enter into contracts for the sale of different prices, to make huge difference, so that the intermediary companies basically do not have that business ethics .

Peregrine days of the company post a suite of nearly one million

Location: Beijing

post the amount of : more than 940,000 yuan

2007 years 8 15, days Peregrine Brokerage Limited to conceal the real estate prices, profit was informed criticism of the Beijing Municipal Construction Committee, in the rectification and reform will be passed before the restrictions Online signing.

this year in February, Peregrine days of real estate brokerage firm engaged in the sale of a stock room course of business of both parties to conceal the real housing price to the buyer shall collect the purchase 634.6 million yuan , 5.4 million yuan to the seller, and the virtual contract in accordance with the 1.60 million housing prices, taxation and other departments to only 136,000 yuan to pay related taxes and fees. Inside and outside the company in Peregrine days ate more than 940,000 yuan of the post. After investigation, the Beijing Municipal Construction Committee finds that the Peregrine-day responsibility for the company and related real estate brokerage personnel Chen Lin, Liu Shan, Jiao Zhi Jiang sides of transactions to conceal the existence of real housing prices, such as transaction information, and any violations of the act of profit.

It is learned that the Beijing Municipal Construction Committee has been irregularities in the company credited to a credit file in real estate brokerage agencies warning information systems, improvement of qualified pre-review of the eligibility restrictions on online signing. Chen Lin, Liu Shan, Jiao Zhi-jiang irregularities and Industry has informed the competent authorities investigated.

“real estate SHOW” Comments: In the current state’s real estate market more and more strict supervision, the day the company Peregrine single suites can eat more than 940,000 yuan of the post, which previously not eat更狠? Owners do not buy a house when the first look at the market, more than 940,000 yuan is not a small number ah.

buyers怒告intermediary for the post

Location: Beijing

post amount: 200,000 yuan

2006 in early, because of house demolition in the city to buy much-needed living space, The very fact that a real estate brokerage commission limited provide housing, Deputy buyers. Later, the very fact that the selected bid was 78 million pairs of the garden is located in Xili, Chaoyang District, real estate, and the signing of an intermediary company commissioned purchase contract, charge d’affaires transfer procedures, the intermediary company agreed to pay the full amount in the very fact that the date of its procedures for transfer of ownership and agency fees charged 19,500 yuan.

The very fact that all monies paid, the agency said the agreement did not apply for her transfer procedures, and in her knowledge, with 58 million to pay the deed tax transaction price, The very fact that the date of transfer of ownership deed found inconsistent with the original price of the deal, the two sides dispute.

after investigation is understood that very fact that the original owner is found that the sale of the 580,000 yuan housing. The very fact that the intermediary companies in terms of price there is fraud, require companies to refund 200,000 yuan房价款. The two sides failed to negotiate on many occasions, the very fact that the prosecution to the court.

“real estate SHOW” Comments: The post intermediary eat prevalent phenomenon in the property market, in order to avoid the undesirable when an intermediary company, buyers should bear in mind the content to see the contract signing. Transfer to verify the identity of the other party to confirm the sale prices, to prevent profit intermediary.

intermediary company owners were not to eat post-default

Location: Beijing

post amount: 13.35 million yuan

2005 years 12 months, the owner commissioned Zhou Yi Shun Hing LaSalle real estate agent to sell Broker Co., Ltd. name of a housing. Zhou hoped to sell 600,000 yuan, and more money selling to the intermediary company, arrived for an intermediary costs. However, other intermediary to find a buyer, the seller did not agree Zhou. Thus, in April 2006, Shun Hing Yick LaSalle Zhou refused to sell the company to go the Court of First Instance on the grounds of housing and asked Zhou to lift “售房commissioned contract” and called for its 30,000 yuan to pay liquidated damages.

first instance court decision to lift the two sides signed the “售房commissioned by the contract”, dismissed the Shun Hing Yick LaSalle’s other claims, brokerage companies appealed to the Second Intermediate Court.

2007 years 1 month, 2 in hospital after hearing that, real estate brokerage firm in the Deputy Housing sale process, should help buyers and sellers to sign a contract for the sale of housing, according to the provisions of the standard fees or illegal profit . According to Yi Shun Hing Readme LaSalle Inc., which earned more than the middle of the post as high as 13.35 yuan, in clear violation of the national real estate brokerage industry on the provisions of the act to disrupt the real estate brokerage industry to develop healthily. Accordingly, the Second Intermediate Court ruling Shun Yi Xing Zhou LaSalle with the signing of the “commissioned售房contract” null and void and rejected the company’s request Zhou held liability for breach of contract requirements.

“real estate SHOW” Comments: intermediary to eat the difference is well-known secret, but that is not to be light. Shun-hing, did not expect benefits LaSalle company also claims to justify a lawsuit, really admire their guts and courage.

black intermediary to sell a suite to make most Suite

Location: Nanjing

post amount: 370,000 yuan

Miss Zhou, who lives in the new model the road on the 26th, she had got to the end of 2006 their own area of 77 square meters the first floor of the house through an intermediary company’s sale. In the intermediary company’s “help” and “guidance”, the house quickly as she had got “sold” out of a Mr. Huang bought her room. In the “real estate sale contract intermediary” in: she had got the price of 55 million will be sold to Mr Wong house. But that is the signing of a contract for the sale of the day, Mr Wong asked She signed a “proxy.”

“I feel strange, since sold to him, so why should we asked him to sell.” She was very puzzled. After a period of time, Mr Wong called She went to the transfer. “But rather than transfer to the yellow name ah, but another person, and housing prices look into 92 million.” She said that until then she came to realize that it was an intermediary in the post to eat.

“black ah! signed with us is 55 million, has sold foreign intermediary 920,000 yuan. This, however, I am sure the families.” She said that the dispute could result from the problems, and then she has been bought by the court to go. It is understood that the case this year in the Gulou District Court.

“real estate SHOW” Comments: second-hand housing transactions, buyers and sellers have to meet to talk about price, personally signed a contract do not give companies an opportunity intermediary. Do not plan time homeowners and ease the right to dispose of housing entrusted to an intermediary company.

who sued the intermediary to buy a house to discuss the difference

Location: Nanjing

post Amount: 32,000 yuan

2006 years 6 months, the public financial intermediary in毛某Jianye District, Nanyuan see if a community garden house, 53.9 square meters, the price 302,000 yuan. Intermediary薛某come up with the owner of a commissioned notary certificate, claiming that Wang薛某has commissioned a free hand in dealing with the trading house. July 6,毛某see the power of attorney after the public with Wang and financial intermediaries signed a tripartite contract for the sale, paying back the principal agreed 302,000 yuan, intermediary costs 4200 yuan, the first to pay 93,000 yuan.

in the contract September 7, 2006 before completing a property transfer毛某all formalities. After a chance, he learned that the owner paying back the principal薛某in fact received only 270,000 yuan, rather than 30.2

Chinese version:房地产中介吃差价大调查 看看深圳被骗的冤大头

中介冒充购房者骗房主

地点：深圳

差价金额：7万元

2007年7月初，杨先生将位于福田区城中雅苑的一处房产同时委托给多家地产中介公司出售，预售价265万元。7月8日，杨先生接到某房地产经纪有限公司城中雅苑分行置业顾问张小姐的电话，张小姐告诉杨先生，客户韦某看中了他的房子，愿意出价260万元购买房子，并已支付5000元押金。

7月10日，杨先生与韦某协商后，以263万元成交，并签订《房地产买卖及居间服务合同》，首期款为20万元。签订合同时，韦某称暂时拿不出首期款，过几天在付款，先向中介公司交付10万元定金。

7月29日，杨先生在上网时无意发现，自己刚卖的房子正在网上销售，卖房者正是买自己房的韦某，只是售价成了270万元。与对方联系，对方称自己是该地产公司的置业顾问。

为此，杨先生多次向该公司投诉，该公司一位负责人表示，韦小姐现已离职，如果杨先生对此次交易有任何疑问，可以通过法律途径解决。而韦小姐却称，此事与她个人无关，请杨先生找公司协商解决。

《地产SHOW》点评：这是非常典型的中介吃差价案例。中介公司人员冒充购房者，利用信息的不对称，隐瞒真实价格，骗取不正当的利益。

贪心中介吃差价被判返还

地点：上海

差价金额：10万元

2005年年初，张小姐通过某中介公司购买江宁路某号房产。签订合同当天，中介公司向张小姐收取定金10万元，并出示一份房屋价格为207万元的房屋买卖合同，随后拿出6份合同叫张小姐逐一签字，而对表明有买受价格为197万元的合同内容，不做任何解释。该房产中介公司还告诉出售人陈先生，买房人张小姐要求提高房价至207万元，为的是获得高额贷款。

2005年3月，张小姐向陈先生索要由中介公司代收10万元房款收据时，陈先生表示从未收过该笔钱款。这引起了张小姐警觉，便于4月5日把中介公司告上法院。张小姐在诉状中说，自己从未向中介公司提出贷款之类的要求，中介公司是在用不正当手段骗取差价。

静安区法院认为，在交易过程中中介公司不但积极办理不同价格的合同，还对张小姐隐瞒真实的买卖价格，与通常操作规则不符。张小姐要求返还10万元的差价可予支持。鉴此，法院遂判决由该中介公司返还张小姐多收房价10万元和中介服务费1万元。

《地产SHOW》点评：以配合办理高额贷款为幌子欺骗原房主，让买卖双方签订不同价格的买卖合同，赚取巨额差价，这样的中介公司根本没有一点商业道德。

百富天公司一套房差价近百万元

地点：北京

差价金额：94万多元

2007年8月15日，百富天房地产经纪有限公司因隐瞒实价、赚取差价，被北京市建委通报批评，在整改合格之前将被限制进行网上签约。

今年2月份，百富天房地产经纪公司在从事一套存量房买卖业务过程中，对交易双方隐瞒真实的房屋成交价格，向买方收取购房款634.6万余元，交给卖方540万元，且虚拟合同按照160万元的房屋价格，向税务等部门仅缴纳相关税费13.6万元。里外里百富天公司吃了94万多元的差价。北京市建委经调查认定，百富天公司和相关责任房地产经纪人员陈琳、刘俊山、焦志疆存在对交易双方隐瞒真实的房屋成交价格等交易信息，违规赚取差价的行为。

据悉，北京市建委已将该公司违规行为记入房地产经纪机构信用档案警示信息系统，整改复查合格前限制网上签约资格。陈琳、刘俊山、焦志疆的违规行为已通报工商主管部门查处。

《地产SHOW》点评：在当前国家对房地产市场监管越来越严格的情况下，百富天公司单套房还能吃94万多元的差价，那以前岂不是吃得更狠？业主在买房时也不先了解一下市场，94万多元可不是个小数目啊。

 

 

购房者为差价怒告中介

地点：北京

差价金额：20万元

2006年年初，因房屋拆迁急需在市内购买居住用房，张女士委托某房地产经纪有限公司提供房源，代理购房。后来，张女士选定报价为78万元的位于朝阳区双花园西里的房产，并与中介公司签订购房委托合同，代办过户手续，中介公司答应在张女士支付全部款项当日为其办理过户手续，并收取了代理费19500元。

张女士支付了全部款项后，中介公司并未按约定当天为她办理过户手续，并在她不知情的情况下，以58万元的交易价格代缴了契税，过户当日张女士发现契税与原定交易价格不符，双方发生争执。

经过调查了解，张女士发现原来原房主是以58万元出售该房屋的。张女士认为该中介公司在价格上存在欺诈，要求中介公司退还20万元房价款。双方多次交涉未果后，张女士起诉至法院。

《地产SHOW》点评：中介吃差价的现象在楼市中普遍存在，为了避免上不良中介公司的当，购房者切记要看清合同内容再签字。过户时要核实对方身份，确认成交价格，防止中介从中渔利。

 

 

中介公司吃差价不成告业主违约

地点：北京

差价金额：13.35万余元

2005年12月，房主周某委托顺益兴联行房地产经纪有限公司代理出售名下的一套住房。周某希望卖60万元，多卖的钱归中介公司所有，抵作中介费。然而等中介找到了买家后，周某又不同意卖房。于是在2006年4月，顺益兴联行公司以周某拒绝出售房屋为由诉至一审法院，要求与周某解除《售房委托合同》并要求其支付违约金3万元。

一审法院判决解除双方签订的《售房委托合同》，驳回了顺益兴联行公司其他诉讼请求，经纪公司不服上诉至二中院。

2007年1月，二中院经审理认为，房地产经纪公司在代理房屋买卖过程中，应协助买卖双方签订房屋买卖合同，按规定标准收取费用，不得非法赚取差价。根据顺益兴联行公司自述，其赚取的中间差价高达13.35万余元，显然违反了国家关于房地产经纪行业的各项规定，其行为扰乱了房地产经纪行业的健康发展。据此，二中院判决顺益兴联行公司与周某签订的《售房委托合同》无效，驳回了该公司要求追究周某违约责任的要求。

《地产SHOW》点评：中介吃差价虽然是众人皆知的秘密，但毕竟是见不得光的。没想到顺益兴联行公司还自认有理的去打官司，真是佩服他们的胆量和勇气。

 

 

黑心中介卖一套房赚多半套房

地点：南京

差价金额：37万元

周女士家住新模范马路26号，2006年年底周女士将自己一套面积77平方米的一楼房子通过某中介公司对外出让。在中介公司的“帮忙”和“指导”下，周女士的房子很快就“卖”了出去，一位黄先生买了她的房。在《房地产买卖中介合同》中：周女士以55万元的价格将房子卖给了黄先生。但也就是在签订买卖合同的当日，黄先生又要求周女士签订了一份《委托书》。

“我就觉得奇怪，既然都卖给他了，为什么还要委托他卖房。”周女士当时很是不解。一段时间后，黄先生叫周女士一起去过户。“但过户不是过到黄名下啊，而是另外一个人，并且房屋价格一下变成了92万元。”周女士说，直到那时她才明白，原来是中介在吃差价。

“黑啊！跟我们签的是55万元，中介对外却卖了92万元。这我肯定不过户了。”周女士说，纠纷由此而起，而随后她也被买受方诉至法庭。据了解，该案今年年中在鼓楼区法院开庭。

《地产SHOW》点评：二手房交易时，买卖双方一定要见面谈价，当面签约，不给中介公司可乘之机。房主千万不要图一时方便，将房屋的处置权委托给中介公司。

 

 

买房人状告中介讨差价

地点：南京

差价金额：3.2万元

2006年6月，毛某在融众中介看中建邺区南苑话园社区的一套房子，53.9平方米，价格30.2万元。中介拿出房主薛某的一份委托公证书，声称薛某已经委托王某全权处理该房子的交易。7月6日，毛某看到委托书后，就与王某及融众中介签订了三方买卖合同，约定房款30.2万元，中介费4200元，首付款9.3万元。

在合同约定的2006年9月7日之前，毛某办完了产权过户等一切手续。之后一个偶然的机会，他得知房主薛某其实只收到房款27万元，而不是30.22007-10-16

标签： intermediary, real, yuan