China’s accession to the WTO

Mr. Long Yongtu, chief negotiator issued a statement recently, saying that “Everyone wants to buy a house, in fact, this concept is very wrong.”

Mr. Long Yongtu do not know whether it is willing to buy a house? People want to have their own homes, which in terms of logical or legal are completely correct. If people安贫乐道, it is more conducive to social stability? Is China into a harmonious society?

If it is released to the view that entrepreneurs also excusable. In a market economy, enterprises have their own target audience, they always put 80% of the profit lock-in customers above 20 percent, through service in a small number of customers, greater economic benefits. But not the same as Mr. Long Yongtu, the former high-ranking government officials, non-governmental organizations, must take into account the needs of every people, and to remind the Government to do everything possible to meet the needs of each resident. If the Government is only a small number of people for services, or the development of China’s real estate market only to meet the needs of a small number of people, then this is bound to the real estate market is unhealthy.

Of course, in meeting the basic needs of the public, the Government must take into account the level of demand, taking into account the phased implementation of the policy, but also ordinary people can not afford to ignore the desire for home ownership, and it can not Western countries to the distribution of real estate ownership of real estate development as China’s strategic targets.

now China’s real estate market development issues, there are many absurd arguments, some scholars and government officials with the rear end in the developer desperately clamor so-called “theory of limited demand for housing,” they put forward Government development in the real estate developers should meet the demand for land, developers should be allowed to lead the real estate market. From the market the general laws of economic development, the Government should remain neutral in the real estate market status, but the crux of the problem lies in the fact that housing is a typical public goods to ensure that every citizen has its own housing, is the Government’s basic responsibilities.

If we ignore the housing needs of residents, one-sided propaganda and real estate leasing policies to encourage the majority of man-made small number of property owners to pay the price, then the allocation of land resources on a serious imbalance. Indeed, in many Western countries, not every resident will be home ownership. However, in these countries, Congress passed the second allocation of tax revenues, have achieved the social sharing of land resources. Entrepreneurs can buy at low government buildings, even without any price paid directly owned historic buildings, but the purchase of historic buildings after the entrepreneurs, we must conduct a comprehensive renovation, and historic buildings may not change the original style. Not only that, but keep in the history of architecture, the entrepreneurs also have to pay high real estate taxes, we must own the real estate market through the transfer of wealth to the community. If these countries can only see the distribution of housing ownership, and home ownership do not see the wealth of the whole community behind the adjustment mechanism, there is no perfect system of our country’s real estate tax, then it will cause a small number of people occupy the majority of people’s wealth, social resources configuration serious injustice phenomenon.

China’s current real estate market in the biggest problem is that the high threshold for market access and market transactions unfair attendant. A small number of real estate developers in particular, the Government set up Real Estate Development Company, made after the development of land in the pursuit of high profits, in the city center to build high-end residential, so that ordinary city dwellers were forced to evacuate the city center to outlying suburbs to buy houses . While a small number of buyers through the Housing market speculation continued to increase circulation and raise the price of commercial housing. The solution to this problem is very simple, that is, those rising prices, the Government should levy a real estate tax so that those involved in speculation speculators lose. In addition, the Government controlled by modifying urban planning, urban centers to ensure that priority areas of land for general commercial building, so that a small number of rich people to the suburbs to buy high-grade commercial housing, while the burden of the rapid development of urban transport the enormous cost.

Finally, I would like to remind Mr. Long Yongtu, the face of China’s chaotic real estate market, public figures in the speech should be cautious when, do not release the wrong signal, seriously mislead the public to influence government decision-making.

龙永图先生的人的想法，每个人都希望购买一所房子，他的错误？ 中国加入世贸组织的

先生首席谈判代表龙永图发表了一项声明，最近，他说： “每个人都想买房，其实，这个概念是非常错误的。 ”

龙永图先生不知道这是否愿意买房子？人们希望拥有自己的住房，这在逻辑或法律是完全正确的。如果人们安贫乐道，它更有利于社会稳定？是中国成为一个和谐的社会？

如果释放到认为，企业家也情有可原。在市场经济中，企业有自己的目标受众，他们总是把80 ％的盈利锁定在百分之二十以上的客户，通过服务于少数客户，更大的经济利益。但不一样的龙永图先生，前政府高级官员，非政府组织，都必须考虑到每个人的需要，并提醒该国政府尽一切可能，以满足每一个居民。如果政府只是一小部分人的服务，或发展中国的房地产市场只能满足一小部分人，那么这势必对房地产市场是不健康的。

当然，在满足基本需求的市民，政府必须考虑到的需求，同时考虑到分阶段实施的政策，但普通老百姓也不能忽视的愿望首页所有权，并且不能以西方国家的分配房地产所有权房地产开发作为中国的战略目标。

目前中国房地产市场发展问题，有许多奇谈怪论，有些学者和政府官员与尾部的开发商拼命鼓噪所谓的“理论的有限的住房需求， ”他们提出了政府的发展房地产开发商应满足对土地的需求，开发商应允许导致房地产市场。从市场的一般规律的经济发展，政府应保持中立，在房地产市场的地位，但问题的症结在于，住房是一种典型的公共物品，以确保每一个公民都有自己的住房，是政府的基本职责。

如果我们忽视了居民的住房需求，片面宣传房地产租赁政策，鼓励多数人为少数业主支付价款，然后分配土地资源的严重失衡。事实上，在许多西方国家，并非每一个居民将自置居所。然而，在这些国家，国会通过的第二次分配的税收收入，实现了社会共享的土地资源。企业家可以购买低政府建筑，甚至在没有任何付出的代价直接拥有的历史建筑，但购买后，历史建筑的企业家，我们必须进行全面翻新，和历史建筑不得改变原有的风格。不仅如此，让历史上的建筑，企业家还必须支付高额的房地产税，我们必须自己的房地产市场通过把财富转移给社会。如果这些国家只能看到分配住房的所有权，和居者有其屋不明白的财富背后的整个社会调整机制，没有完善的制度是我国房地产税，那么它会引起少数人的占据大多数人的财富，社会资源配置的严重不公正现象。

中国当前的房地产市场最大的问题是，高门槛的市场准入和市场交易不公平的服务员。少数房地产开发商特别是，政府成立了房地产开发公司，开发后的土地在追求高利润，在市中心建造高档住宅，从而使普通城市居民被迫疏散城市中心向外围郊区买房子。虽然有少数买家通过房地产市场投机活动继续增加，流通，提高商品住宅的价格。解决这个问题的办法很简单，就是那些价格上涨，政府应征收房地产税，使那些参与投机炒家失去。此外，政府控制的修改城市规划，城市中心，以确保重点地区的土地用于一般的商业楼宇，因此，少数富人向郊区购买高档商品房，而负担的迅速发展城市交通的巨大代价。

最后，我想提醒龙永图先生，面对中国的房地产市场混乱，公众人物在演讲时应当谨慎，不要释放错误的信号，严重误导公众，影响政府决策决策。