“The main crux of the problem is, people did not change the concept, everyone wants to buy a house, in fact, this concept is very wrong,” Long Yongtu on getting the Americans for more than the per capita housing said that the United States three adult group home, the crowd六成renters, the actual home, not many people. In his view, the majority of Chinese people should be in for a long time to resolve the issue of rent, the people of the target is “to have a house to live, rather than always bashing attention一股脑abuse in the” high price “on.

Long Yongtu in Nanjing “Dialogue China” High-Level Forum on the above remarks, say, from the economics perspective, the author is very much in favor of. Economics is a wonderful science, it depends on the supply and demand, in fact, Long said, “the general price and let the market to adjust” - that is, Adam Smith’s only market, “Look no hands “- is a scientific way. It should be said that as an economist, Long Yongtu solemnly carried out his duties. Long-term consideration, this is a panacea.

in this dialogue, there is a little key to the key word, “ordinary people” - is “the people” rather than “citizens.” As a historian, Tocqueville said, “there are still people, but no citizen” of the society is a cause for concern society. Contact Under these circumstances, this universal discourse, should we really are in a “people” status of the history of it? Imply that the responsibilities of citizens, obligations, means that the owner of the rights and interests … … and people seem to be more reminiscent of the “subjects”, “subjects” such a concept. The same is true in fact. Because of the current Chinese people, not a house, is not the dignity of life. For the economy, this is a period of adjustment; For individuals, it is not be tolerated.

This involves a contradiction, and “people” and “economics” between how to have a choice? From the economics perspective, I think, as a non-HA who also can support Long’s remarks. However, related to each “people” when the real estate why not married? Their lives to wait for it? Is this as a victim of economic laws? Under the current situation as “ordinary people” want is practical measures, to the practical results.

rising house prices, real estate … … simple supply and demand analysis, we can say it in line with economic laws, but we need what kind of economics? Economics is to kill it? Economics cold? Is it has no roots in economics without the base of it? No, the economy is the economy, the economy there is no human nature, but we want is humane housing system is needed is the policy of humanity - not the economic system of the property. Do not own homes, why the music industry? “ordinary people” to live and work, the state is the true prosperity. Three advantages, can not forget also conducive to improving people’s living standards.

Singapore property system is very interesting - citizens can not have a spare room. Is “citizens.” Perhaps this is the only effective way to allow “the people” can see the results, rather than as a victim of economics. “Everyone wants to buy the concept is wrong. “This sentence is true in economics. Shallow to understand the laws of economics, anyone can say this, but “wait for you to get married soon, you know that you say how ridiculous. “low-rent housing policy appears to be reasonable, they are just the surface dressed, is a compromise, tactful policy, away from the true sense of the improvement of the people’s quality of life there is quite a gap.

economists have two responsibilities, trying to interpret the world, they are scientists, just consider the laws of economics; another, as a policy adviser to the economists, they are trying to provide help to improve世界. Long Yongtu, as a policy adviser, please as “ordinary people” think.

我们的人民，什么什么样的经济学？

“的主要症结问题是，人们并没有改变观念，每个人都想买房，其实，这个概念是非常错误的” ，龙永图让美国人超过人均住房说，美国三成人组家庭，六成人群租房，实际的家庭，没有多少人。他认为，我国大多数人民应该在很长一段时间来解决这个问题的租金，人民的目标是“有房子住，而不是总是一股脑扑注意滥用的”高价格“对。

龙永图在南京“对话中国”高层论坛上说上述这番话的，也就是说，从经济学的角度来看，作者是非常有利的。经济学是一个美好的科学，它取决于供应和需求，事实上，龙永图说， “一般的价格，让市场来调整” -也就是亚当斯密的唯一市场， “看看没有手” -是一种科学的方法。应当说，作为一个经济学家，龙龙永图庄严履行了他的职责。长远考虑，这是一种灵丹妙药。

在这一对话中，有一个小关键的关键词， “常人” -是“人民”而不是“公民。 “作为一个历史学家，托克维尔说： ”仍有一些人，但是没有公民“的社会是一个令人关注的社会。联系在这种情况下，这种普遍的话语，我们应该真正是在”人“的历史地位呢？意味着公民的责任，义务，这意味着所有者的权利和利益… … ，人们似乎更让人联想到“主体” ， “主体”这样一个概念。同样，真正的事实。由于当前我国人民，而不是一所房子，是不是尊严的生活。经济，这是一个调整期;对于个人而言，这是不能容许的。

这方面的矛盾和“人民”和“经济学”之间如何选择？从经济学角度来说，我觉得，作为一个非医管局谁也可以支持长期的谈话。然而，每一个有关“人”的房地产时，为什么不结婚了吗？他们的生命等待呢？这是作为一个受害者的经济规律？在当前形势下的“常人”要的是切实可行的措施，以实际成果。

房价上涨，房地产… …简单的供应和需求的分析，我们可以说是符合经济规律，但我们需要什么样的经济学？经济学是杀死它？经济学冷，难道是没有根基没有经济学的基础吗？否，经济是经济，经济也没有人性的，但我们需要的是人道需要住房制度的政策是人类-不是经济体制的财产。没有自己的家园，为什么音乐行业？ “普通人“的生活和工作中，国家是真正的繁荣。三个有利于，不能忘记也有利于提高人民生活水平。

新加坡知识产权制度是非常有趣的-公民不能有备件室。是”公民。 “也许这是唯一有效的途径，让”人民“可以看到的结果，而不是受害者的经济学。 ”每个人都想购买这一概念是错误的。 “这句话是真的经济学。浅层了解经济规律，任何人都可以这样说，但”等你结婚不久，你知道你说的如何荒谬的。 “廉租住房政策似乎是合理的，他们只是表面穿着，是一种妥协，委婉政策，离真正意义上的改善人们的生活质量有相当的差距。

经济学家有两个责任，试图解释世界，他们是科学家，只是考虑经济规律;另外，作为政策顾问的经济学家，他们正试图提供帮助，以改善世界。龙永图，作为政策顾问，请作为“常人”的想法。