Renzhijiang that this "provision" to solve the problem about the following five :

1, disorderly recent years land supply, without accounting for the many projects, resulting in wastage of land resources and waste. Through the "tender and auction" by the government-controlled land in a planned total market supply to meet the real estate market macro-control role ;

2, land prices out of control because of the many crimes resulting increase in land costs, and numerous land deals is no open land supply market. Therefore, the "tender and auction" to resolve the "land costs" reduce, prevent and reduce crimes "real" ;

3, agreements transferring no way to introduce market competition mechanism and the lack of openness is a major source of official corruption, but also the root cause disorderly land supply. Using "tender and auction," China has stopped its way to prevent corruption and to make the land market transparency, oversight and management ;

4 benefit, the power of national ownership of land, land value-added benefits to be established at the government. Several land deals were not on the value-added profits in the pocket. When all the agreements banning the sale, the proceeds belong to the land value of all government. "tender and auction" can also be used in accepting the highest competition more additional revenue ;

5, land transfer agreement not to the strength of the many "shell" companies with an opportunity to use their relationship to land, and strength in development but profit. "tender and auction" can eliminate those without strength "shell" companies, which carry out development genuine strength enterprises access to land, in favour of regulating the market.

In short, "the tender and auction" to the government, in terms of benefits to the market more, promising. That is why, in the "Real Estate Law" legislation with the "transferring Ordinance" (55 orders) will be issued when the "tender and auction" in the use-right of state-owned land sold three ways. And provides "conditional must take auction, tender, can not take auction, tender, the two sides agreed to take. "(Real Estate Law Article 12). Then tried to use legislation to solve the problem of re-thinking on the merits scrutiny. Of course, the 11 orders with a major difference is that in the past the only one cited "property law" in the first half of Article 12 (semi-luxury residential land will be replaced by a commodity residential), and cut "can not take auction, tender : :" Lot. Such an approach could eliminate the agreement transferring the land, but whether it is conducive to the development of the property market on the unknown.

It is understood that two of the 11 orders were clear on the "tender and auction" acts made provisions which are very clearly defined by the government as one of the acts. Article IV of the land must be sold nature made. But there is no clear need for such listing, tender or auction sites for land management authority. According to the above understanding of the coherence and take it that these people are out of the land management authority is the right to ownership and use of land? Then on the jurisdiction of the document is very clear. 11 orders of the government as one of the only jurisdiction ownership and land use rights of business sold, the people are not entirely without jurisdiction and ownership of land use rights transfer.

11 orders made plans for the land transfer activities. Starting from the overall need for a macro plan means to regulate and control economic activity. But if the land transfer programme completely controlled by the government, government bodies on the market to test the analysis and judgement. Hainan has occurred in the past with the way the North Sea can not say it has nothing to do with local government regulation setback

When real estate development have become the mainstream in economic construction, a land supply and regulation will directly affect the region to the country's economic development. When land supply shortfall is the economic impact of the terrible; When excessive supply of land, the economic impact is equally terrible. The haphazard nature of the plan has been for decades the development of China has been proved by history, China from a planned economy to a market economy only. The market economy is also to the success of the government's "rule by doing nothing" and rely on free competition and private investment in the autonomous formation of SMEs is the dominant model of economic development. Perhaps the introduction of the new approach is not conducive to dealing in the financial capital market is underdeveloped, the SME competition. Without the participation of SMEs in the competition, there would be no market active sexual (all major state-owned enterprises, investment from outside is small and China, and China Great), the market may be eliminated in administrative monopolies, SMEs, but also eliminated the market vitality.

land supply plans sold only affect the real estate market itself is not a problem, and will affect the entire market economy. All hope of transferring the land market to play a positive role in promoting the regulation of the market and to stabilize and control the real estate market steady development, and promote the development of the entire national economy.